|
The Inside Scoop: Community Forum
|
|
Inquiring minds want to know!
Welcome to YCDC's "Inside Scoop", a place where you can gain insights from others
in the dyslexia community and share your experiences. Tell us about what reading programs
worked for you, your child, or your students. Pose a question to the community; tell us
about schools using thoughtful and effective methods for supporting dyslexic students; tell us
about places and programs that might be overrated. We hope that postings will be constructive
and helpful to others. We reserve the right to remove material. We will not post contact
information, but ask that you leave your email address. The Center may wish to follow up
to learn more.
This information has been posted by visitors to this site. These opinions are personal and
DO NOT reflect the views of YCDC.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dyslexia Site Admin
Joined: 22 Oct 2008 Posts: 7
|
Post subject: Lindamood-Bell Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:47 pm |
|
|
As an educator, I admit that I was initially suspicious of the slick marketing materials produced by Lindamood-Bell. They felt like they belonged to a shopping mall, not a school. However, after hearing learning specialists and parents claim that Lindamood-Bell had significantly helped several struggling readers, my husband and I decided to investigate whether it might be a good program for our ten-year-old son.
Our first challenge was the amount of time required to participate in the program. Its success is predicated on intensive immersion-it requires a commitment of four hours, five days a week, until the students’ reading goals are met. I felt uneasy about the demanding nature of the plan and the cynical part of me toyed with option of initially only trying it for two hours before committing to the recommended four hours.
Then I spoke with a friend who had recently tried just that. She cautioned that her son did the "after-school, two-hour" version for several months and made little progress for all his effort. They ultimately ended up committing to the recommended plan of four-hour sessions over the summer and reported that it made a significant difference in his reading abilities. I appreciated her candid warning. There IS a reason that the centers do not endorse the “convenience model”. It’s not nearly as effective.
I was able to get our school to agree to the radical plan of having my son miss school in the morning to go to Lindamood-Bell and return at lunch for the afternoon part of the school day. It was the only way to make it work. Everyone agreed that if he wasn’t reading, the morning wasn’t worth much anyway.
The instruction involves students sitting in cubicles with a scripted instructor for four hours. To help offset the potential monotony, the instructors change every hour. Our son wanted to read so badly, his ambition overrode his hesitation about the set-up. According to him, the instructors varied in quality and general appeal. Every night at dinner, we would get a humorous replay of his rotation through the various personalities and teaching styles.
The bottom line: did it work? Yes, yes, yes. It was a significant experience for our son. Because he has auditory processing and visual memory deficits, he did the LIPS and Seeing Stars programs. Reading will never be easy for him, but it is much easier after Lindamood-Bell. He left with new decoding and spelling strategies that transformed his entire relationship to school. I highly recommend the program if it’s an option.
Oh yes, as much as we would have liked to, we did not do the recommended follow-up lessons at home. It was not realistic for us, but I am sure that they would have provided helpful reinforcement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
|